Prepared Data

Prepare

Prepare your data as specified or use our professional services.

View details »

razorC.net CMS

Submit

Submit your data using this website. We process anomaly detection and send your report within minutes.

View details »

razorC.net CMS

Learn

Learn which factors highly associate with outcomes.

View details »


FoundationDx

FoundationDx builds and automates innovative machine learning solutions in healthcare and underserved organizations that need to efficiently and effectively drive patient satisfaction, healthcare quality and process performance goals in complex data environments. 
 
We’re a small, self-funded company that’s led by its founders. Most importantly, we make services that we love, and it shows. Our subscribers are more than customers… they’re fans who share our passion for the opportunities that AI presents in their business and community. We’re growing at a quick but manageable pace, not because of big rounds of funding, but because we provide valuable early insights into process risk and performance improvement factors at modest cost.
 

Special programs are provided for 501(c)(3) organizations

 

Unsupervised learning for Anomaly Detection

FoundationDx is offering Quick Turnaround machine learning studies to evaluate the effectiveness of using automated anomaly detection for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of your data driven quality and outcome processes.
 
We use Large Langauge Models (LLMs) to help craft, code and refine our Machine Learning (ML) solutions.
 
 

⚖️ Comparison: LLMs vs Traditional ML on Small Tabular Datasets

FeatureLLMsMachine Learning
Input Format Requires text (needs conversion or prompting) Works directly with structured/tabular data
Performance on small datasets Often worse unless fine-tuned on specific domain data Generally better out of the box
Explainability Low (black box) Higher (especially with linear/logistic models or decision trees)
Training on small data Needs heavy prompt engineering or fine-tuning Well-suited for training on thousands or millions of rows
Inference speed Slower (esp. large models) Faster and cheaper
Flexibility Can be used for many modalities (text/image/code/etc.) and unstructured data Tuned to structured formats only

 

✅ Network Threat Anomaly Detection vs. Rule-Based Systems

Benefit / FeatureAnomaly DetectionRule-Based Systems
1. Unknown Threat Detection ✅ Detects zero-day attacks and novel behaviors via statistical deviations ❌ Can only detect threats explicitly defined in rules
2. Adaptability / Learning Over Time ✅ Learns evolving patterns dynamically (e.g., changing login hours, new software) ❌ Requires constant manual rule updates
3. User Behavior Profiling ✅ Builds baselines for individual users or groups ❌ Applies generic rules to all users
4. Peer Group Comparison ✅ Detects users whose behavior deviates from others in their department or role ❌ Cannot easily compare users against peers
5. Time-of-Day or Geo Context Awareness ✅ Flags unusual access based on time/location history ⚠️ Possible with complex rules, but rarely implemented
6. Lateral Movement Detection ✅ Identifies cross-system or cross-group traversal that's abnormal ⚠️ Requires preconfigured disallowed movement paths
7. Privilege Escalation Detection ✅ Flags sudden or gradual group membership changes that deviate from norm ❌ Needs explicit rule per group or combination
8. Device/Host Profiling ✅ Detects new or compromised endpoints by learning communication patterns ❌ Only detects listed suspicious hosts or known MAC/IPs
9. Access Pattern Monitoring ✅ Learns resource access patterns (e.g., file types, apps used) ❌ Needs detailed manual rules for every pattern
10. Beaconing / C2 Traffic Detection ✅ Catches repetitive, low-volume, periodic traffic via time series modeling ❌ Misses if destination is not on a blocklist
11. Data Exfiltration Behavior ✅ Identifies large or unusual uploads/downloads relative to user norm ⚠️ Catches only if specific volume or domains are defined
12. Insider Threat Detection ✅ Flags subtle behavior changes over time like privilege creep or access abuse ❌ Often missed if activity is within policy
13. Multivariate Feature Correlation ✅ Analyzes multiple dimensions (e.g., IP + file + time + frequency) to detect anomalies ❌ Rules usually apply to one or two fields only
14. Alert Prioritization / Risk Scoring ✅ Can provide risk scores based on anomaly severity ⚠️ Rules are binary — trigger or don’t trigger
15. Scalability to Large Environments ✅ Learns automatically across 1000s of users, devices, roles ❌ Rules become unmanageable and prone to gaps at scale
16. Seasonal / Cyclical Behavior Modeling ✅ Detects expected spikes (e.g., end-of-month reporting) and flags deviations from seasonal baselines ❌ No concept of seasonality or periodicity
17. False Positive Reduction ✅ Can reduce noise by learning what’s “normal noise” ❌ Prone to frequent false positives if rules are too strict
18. Deployment Flexibility ⚠️ Needs training phase and model tuning ✅ Easy to deploy with static rules
19. Explainability / Audit Trail ⚠️ Often needs supporting context to explain why something was flagged ✅ Rules are explicit and easy to audit
20. Compliance and Policy Enforcement ⚠️ Not ideal for enforcing strict regulatory policies ✅ Excellent for clear “must” and “must not” policy controls

 

Population Health Management - Anomaly Detection vs. Rule-Based Systems

Benefit / Use CaseAnomaly DetectionRule-Based Systems
1. Early Identification of Patient Deterioration ✅ Detects subtle deviations in vitals, behavior, or lab results indicating risk before thresholds are crossed ❌ Misses early signs unless values exceed predefined limits
2. Detection of Emerging Risk Patterns ✅ Learns complex patterns across labs, medications, claims, and lifestyle data ❌ Can only detect what is explicitly encoded as a rule
3. Predicting Hospital Readmissions ✅ Uses historical and contextual data to model high-risk readmission profiles ⚠️ Relies on static rules (e.g., “readmitted within 30 days”)
4. Medication Adherence Monitoring ✅ Flags unusual refill patterns, dosage changes, or usage gaps based on personal norms ⚠️ Requires hard-coded schedules or refill intervals
5. Identifying Fraud or Overutilization ✅ Finds billing or usage patterns deviating from norm (e.g., duplicate procedures, excessive visits) ❌ Needs specific rule for each type of abuse
6. Tracking Chronic Disease Progression ✅ Models patient trajectory over time (e.g., A1C drift, symptom severity) ⚠️ Only flags when metrics exceed thresholds
7. Stratifying Patient Risk Levels ✅ Learns risk profiles across populations dynamically based on multivariate data ⚠️ Often based on checklists or scorecard rules
8. Outlier Detection in Clinical Practice ✅ Identifies providers whose practices deviate significantly from peers ⚠️ Requires manual definition of acceptable bounds
9. Personalized Intervention Recommendations ✅ Suggests interventions based on anomaly patterns in lifestyle, socioeconomic, or biometric data ❌ Offers same interventions to similar rule hits
10. Complex Comorbidity Interaction Handling ✅ Learns nonlinear relationships among conditions (e.g., diabetes + COPD + depression) ❌ Rules become exponentially harder to define with more variables
11. Alert Fatigue Reduction ✅ Reduces false alarms by learning what’s normal for each patient/population ❌ Static rules often lead to excessive and low-value alerts
12. Behavior-Driven Risk Detection ✅ Detects lifestyle or psychosocial factors (e.g., activity drop, missed appointments) ⚠️ Only captured if rules are built for each behavior pattern
13. Tailoring Care Pathways ✅ Adjusts care plans dynamically as patient patterns change ❌ Predefined plans only adapt with manual review
14. Resource Allocation Optimization ✅ Forecasts future demand based on changing patient conditions and trends ⚠️ Rules allocate based on averages, not predictive shifts
15. Disease Outbreak Detection ✅ Detects emerging clusters via syndromic surveillance, behavior changes, and health logs ❌ Must wait for thresholds to be crossed or outbreak definitions triggered
16. Population Surveillance at Scale ✅ Scales across large health systems and adapts to regional differences ❌ Becomes cumbersome as population diversity increases
17. Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) ✅ Correlates health outcomes with zip code, income, food access, housing instability, etc. ⚠️ Needs manual coding of SDoH indicators and risk triggers
18. COVID/Post-pandemic Health Pattern Shifts ✅ Picks up deviations from pre-pandemic baselines across chronic care, mental health, etc. ❌ Rules must be rebuilt to account for new norms
19. Explainability for Clinicians ⚠️ Requires supporting visualizations or risk score context ✅ Simple to explain: “Rule triggered due to A1C > 9”
20. Compliance and Protocol Adherence ⚠️ Not ideal for strict protocol adherence monitoring ✅ Excellent for ensuring procedures follow clinical guidelines

Contact

AI powered by

FoundationDx

Philadelphia, PA.
Phone: (267) 358-0984

News

 

 

 

Machine Learning vs. LLMs?